Harvard university discontinued course by Dr Subramanian Swamy after this article was published

[ashdoc]

India, along with Israel, Southern Sudan, etc., have been the battlefields in endless bloody wars to install a universal caliphate, the objective of the global jihad.

Here, Subramanian Swamy, Janata Party President, a Professor of Economics and a former Union Cabinet Minister, lays out a strategy to "wipe out Islamic terror" in India.
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/a...ic-terror.html

*How to wipe out Islamic terror*
Dr. Subramaniam Swamy, July 14, 2011

The terrorist blast in Mumbai on July 13, 2011 requires a decisive soul searching by Hindus of India. Hindus cannot accept to be killed in this Halal fashion, continuously bleeding every day, till the nation finally collapses. Terrorism, I define here as the illegal use of force to overawe the civilian population to make it do or not do an act against their will and well-being.

There are about 40 reported and unreported terrorist attacks per month in the country. That is why the recent US National Counter-Terrorism Centre publication A Chronology of International Terrorism states: ‘India suffered more terrorist acts than any other country’.

While the PM thinks that Maoists’ threat is most serious, I think Islamic terrorism is an even more serious existential threat. If we did not have today the present Union Home Minister, PM, and UPA chairperson, then Maoists can be eliminated in a month, much as I did with the LTTE in Tamil Nadu, as a senior minister in 1991, or MGR did with the Naxalites in the early 1980s. Islamic threat to the nation is different.

Why is Islamic terrorism our number one problem of national security? About this there will be no doubt in anyone's mind after 2012. By that year, I expect a Taliban takeover in Pakistan and the Americans to flee Afghanistan. Then, Islam will confront Hinduism to ‘complete unfinished business’. Already the successor to Osama Bin Laden as the Al Qaeda leader has declared that India is the priority target for that terrorist organisation and not the USA.

Fanatic Muslims consider Hindu dominated India as "an unfinished chapter of Islamic conquests". I may be recalled that all other countries conquered by Islam became 100% converted to Islam within two decades of the Islamic invasion. India is the exception. Undivided India in 1947 was 75% Hindu even after 800 years of brutal Islamic rule. That is jarring for the Islamic fanatics.

Let us remember that every Hindu-Muslim riot in India since 1947, has been ignited by Muslim fanatics — if one goes by all the Commissions of Inquiry set up after every riot. Even the Gujarat riots were triggered by the brutal killing of 56 women and children by setting fire to a rail coach in Godhra.

By today’s definition these riots are all terrorist acts. Muslims, though a minority in India, still have fanatics who dare tolead violent attacks against Hindus. Other Muslims of India just lump it, sulk or rejoice. That is the history from Babar’s time to Aurangzeb. There have been exceptions to this apathy of Muslims like Dara Shikoh, in the old days, or like M J Akbar and Salman Haidar today who are not afraid to speak out against Islamic terror, but still they remain exceptions.

*Blame the Hindus*
In one sense, I do not blame the Muslim fanatics for targeting Hindus. I blame us Hindus who have taken their individuality permitted in Sanatana Dharma to the extreme. Millions of Hindus can assemble without state patronage for Kumbh Mela completely self-organised, but they all leave for home oblivious of the targeting of Hindus in Kashmir, Mau, Melvisharam and Malappuram and do not lift their little finger to help organise Hindus. For example, if half the Hindus vote together rising above their caste and language, a genuine Hindu party will have a two-thirds majority in Parliament and Assemblies.

The secularists now tout instances of Hindu fanatics committing terrorist attacks against Muslims or other minorities. But these attacks are mostly state sponsored, often by the Congress itself, and not by Hindu ‘non-state actors’. Muslim-led attacks are however all by ‘non-state actors’ unless one includes the ISI and rogue elements in Pakistan’s army which are aiding them, as state sponsoring.

Fanatic Muslim attacks have been carried out to target and demoralise the Hindus, to make Hindus yield that which they should not, with the aim of undermining and ultimately to dismantle the Hindu foundation of India. This is the unfinished war of 1,000 years which Osama bin Laden talks about. In fact, the earliest terror tactics in India were deployed in Bengal 1946 by Suhrawady and Jinnah to terrorise Hindus to give in on the demand for Pakistan. The Congress party claiming to represent the Hindus capitulated, and handed 25 per cent of India on a platter to Mohammed Ali Jinnah. Now they want the remaining 75 per cent.

*Forces against Hindus*
This is not to say that other stooges have not targeted Hindus. During the last six decades since Independence, British imperialist-inspired Dravidian movement led by E V Ramaswamy Naicker, in the name of rationalism tried to debunk as irrational the Hindu religion, and terrorised the Hindu priestly class, ie, the Brahmins, for propagating the Hindu religion.

The movement’s organisational arm, the Dravida Kazhagam (DK), had venerated Ravana for 50 years to spite the Hindu adoration of Rama and vulgarise the abduction of Sita, till the DK belatedly learnt that Ravana was a Brahmin and a pious bhakta of Lord Shiva too. Abandoning this course of defaming Ramayana, the DK have now become stooges of the anti-Indian LTTE which has specialised in killing the Hindu Tamil leadership in Sri Lanka. Of course the DK has now been orphaned by the decimation of the LTTE.

[Sane Less]

Do we really have politicians like this

[rationalthinker]

What 'COURSE'?

[ashdoc]

Originally Posted by rationalthinker

What 'COURSE'?

http://articles.economictimes.indiat...aculty-meeting

http://articles.timesofindia.indiati...amic-terrorism

[jeetiaf]

So 1991 riots were instigated by muslims?, They are enough of Hindu right wingers as well who want Akhand Bharat even though modern Bharat is messy? Entire history of west and the middle east had always been like this even before Islam emerged, they were fighting since the time of Byzantine empire, the fight continued between Catholic churches and Orthodox churches even in fourth crusade, Catholic crusader murdered Orthodox and raped orthodox nuns, Soviets invade Afghanistan and then Americans for strategic and economic depth but terrorists are Muslims? Israel is formed on the land where Palestinians were living for thousands of years but it is Palestinian Arabs who are terrorist?
"One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter", it is all about taking side

jeetIAF

[shruthi_ks]

Originally Posted by ashdoc

India, along with Israel, Southern Sudan, etc., have been the battlefields in endless bloody wars to install a universal caliphate, the objective of the global jihad.

Here, Subramanian Swamy, Janata Party President, a Professor of Economics and a former Union Cabinet Minister, lays out a strategy to "wipe out Islamic terror" in India.
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/a...ic-terror.html

Doctor,

TERI kabar khod rahe hai Amrika wale.

Guys like this, guys like Jethmalani …. All have been offered US citizenship to make anti-Muslim statements, tirade. They will flee to US and leave other Indians to be at the mercy of hordes of Muslim invaders.

That’s why I advise you to use your profession to settle in West.