Bollywood Surrogacy trend

[Bhidubhai]

Karan has twins through surrogacy. Recently superstar Tushar Kapoor had one. And of course Hakla had one too earlier. I think Manish Malhotra will also have one soon. But govt is working to put an end to this madness.

When wil TOILET paper publish the baby shower photos?. KJo's might have been very lavish.

BTW, superstar TK bhi kjo biradari wala hai Kyla? Mujhe tho lagta tha uske KhanDan ne Softie ko rakha hai but maybe Sirf wo uske behan ki jaydaad hai

[sgars]

Originally Posted by Bhidubhai

But govt is working to put an end to this madness.

I thought this madness or whatever was already outlawed. So i was surprised to see this nooze.

Why cant these guys learn from Sushmita Sen and adopt some girl thrown away.

[Jaggudada]

Why don't these chutiyas adopt instead?

[Bhidubhai]

Originally Posted by sgars

I thought this madness or whatever was already outlawed. So i was surprised to see this nooze.

Why cant these guys learn from Sushmita Sen and adopt some girl thrown away.

True. Sush has shown such class in this aspect.

[Bhidubhai]

Originally Posted by Jaggudada

Why don't these chutiyas adopt instead?

Correct.

In any case they adopted a lifestyle that doesnt produce children. So why bother? I dont understand their logic.

[jeetiaf]

Originally Posted by Bhidubhai

Correct.

In any case they adopted a lifestyle that doesnt produce children. So why bother? I dont understand their logic.

Why go through all such hassle? Pregnancy and stable relationship and all when one can have all these at appropriate price?

jeetIAF

[Bhidubhai]

Originally Posted by jeetiaf

Why go through all such hassle? Pregnancy and stable relationship and all when one can have all these at appropriate price?

jeetIAF

If one likes banging same gender and be unconventional, then be unconventional in not having children too. Why crave for them and that too of ones own DNA? Isnt it (according to liberal chutiyas who want to be accepted) too conventional and narrow minded to crave for kids of own DNA?

[Aashika]

Originally Posted by Bhidubhai

If one likes banging same gender and be unconventional, then be unconventional in not having children too. Why crave for them and that too of ones own DNA? Isnt it (according to liberal chutiyas who want to be accepted) too conventional and narrow minded to crave for kids of own DNA?

isnt that a personal choice? whether or not to have kids of their own DNA or adopt?
By this logic, even people who are married should adopt? why have their own biological?

[Bhidubhai]

Originally Posted by Aashika

isnt that a personal choice? whether or not to have kids of their own DNA or adopt?
By this logic, even people who are married should adopt? why have their own biological?

I have no issues with personal choices. But just trying to point out how some reserve the right to diss conventions as and when convenient. They want to be seen as unconventional, progressive etc. While still yearning for their own DNA propagation which isn't so progressive from their own perspective.

Why should people, who can reproduce, adopt? And if it is a matter of choice, then what's wrong with choice of sex? If these buggers are forced due to their choice and circumstances, then there are many poor who want a choice of sex becaus of their own circumstances? Why do these dumbos come out and criticise such choices, wear a progressive mask and be all judgemental when they harbour such regressive mindset of DNA choice.

Also, aren't these progressive types worried about poverty, burdening limited resources etc? If they are true to it then they should rather adopt than bring more lives to burden earth further.

So I see hypocrisy in such actions at many levels by KJo types. I would have no prob in their choices if they did not sit in judgement of others and preach liberalism when suitable.

[ashdoc]

Originally Posted by Bhidubhai

superstar Tushar Kapoor

[Napolean]

Originally Posted by Bhidubhai

True. Sush has shown such class in this aspect.

So what other choice did she have if she did not want to marry? Be pregnant and bear a child?

[raniraja]

Originally Posted by Bhidubhai

If one likes banging same gender and be unconventional, then be unconventional in not having children too. Why crave for them and that too of ones own DNA? Isnt it (according to liberal chutiyas who want to be accepted) too conventional and narrow minded to crave for kids of own DNA?

Maybe his parents wanted a waaris

Originally Posted by Napolean

So what other choice did she have if she did not want to marry? Be pregnant and bear a child?

Why not ?? Another bangalan did it with Viv Richards... ?? Neena Gupta ??

[Aashika]

Originally Posted by Napolean

So what other choice did she have if she did not want to marry? Be pregnant and bear a child?

adopt is what he is saying.
But i dont agree with it.

I think progressiveness is not complete for anyone. Just because one has that so called progressiveness, that doesnt mean he/she should be of the same thought consistently, especially when it comes to life changing decisions like kids.

Surrogacy is one of the most beautiful things that has happened in the recent past for people who want their own DNA and cannot.
Same sex couples, single parents and people who cannot themselves have a kid naturally can go this route.

[Aashika]

Originally Posted by Bhidubhai

I have no issues with personal choices. But just trying to point out how some reserve the right to diss conventions as and when convenient. They want to be seen as unconventional, progressive etc. While still yearning for their own DNA propagation which isn't so progressive from their own perspective.

Why should people, who can reproduce, adopt? And if it is a matter of choice, then what's wrong with choice of sex? If these buggers are forced due to their choice and circumstances, then there are many poor who want a choice of sex becaus of their own circumstances? Why do these dumbos come out and criticise such choices, wear a progressive mask and be all judgemental when they harbour such regressive mindset of DNA choice.

Also, aren't these progressive types worried about poverty, burdening limited resources etc? If they are true to it then they should rather adopt than bring more lives to burden earth further.

So I see hypocrisy in such actions at many levels by KJo types. I would have no prob in their choices if they did not sit in judgement of others and preach liberalism when suitable.

I think its unfair to expect people (celebrities mainly) to act progressively when it comes to children. Everyone wants a child and he is no exception.

Are you saying that female feticide and surrogacy more or less same?

[raniraja]

Originally Posted by Aashika

I think its unfair to expect people (celebrities mainly) to act progressively when it comes to children. Everyone wants a child and he is no exception.

Are you saying that female feticide and surrogacy more or less same?

Actually you bring up a sensitive topic. Is surrogacy an excuse for tailor-made progeny ?