Hell hath no fury as a woman scorned !

[sarv_shaktimaan]

Sushma Swaraj 's Lok Sabha speech in reply to allegations over Lalit Modi

IMPORTANT NOTICE: No media files are hosted on these forums. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website. We can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. If the video does not play, wait a minute or try again later.

I AGREE

Minister of External Affairs Smt Sushma Swaraj today through her hard hitting speech in reply to allegations made by opposition Congress party over Lalit Modi case proved that proverb right: Sau Sunaar Ki, Ek Luhaar Ki.

Sushma earned pat on the back by senior MP Lal Krishna Advani on her back after she completed her speech.

Sushma not just refuted the allegations made by Congress party including Rahul and Sonia Gandhi effectively but also lodged counter offence by quoting former Congress vice president and Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh late Arjun Sinh's book and revealed how then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi had made a deal with America and made a way for escape of main accused of Bhopal gas tragedy in which 15,000 people were killed. Rajiv had made this deal for release of childhood friend who was in jail in America for 35-year term, Sushma alleged.

Sushma's hard hitting speech happened amid chaos created by opposition Congress members. Congress leader Sonia Gandhi was seen on TV asking one of her colleagues to shout even louder slogans when her husband was under attack by Sushma for serious charges. Unable to counter Sushma over facts, the Congress MPs shouted loud slogans throughout Sushma Swaraj's speech. Most MPs were seen using earphones to listen to Sushma Swaraj's speech clearly amid slogan shouting.

Sushma Swaraj exposed Congress that how for four long years when Congress was in power no procedure was done against Lalit Modi. In support of her arguments he showed number of documents. She also exposed procedural lapses on Congress part because of which extradition of Lalit Modi couldn't be possible. She clarified that Lalit Modi was not fugitive.

She said her daughter was 9th rank junior lawyer of Lalit Modi and she had not received a single Rupee. She revealed how then Finance Minister P Chidambaram's wife was assigned job to represent as lawyer for same department. Sushma Swaraj's speech literally punctured the bogus allegations made by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi and others who have stalled the parliament throughout the ongoing monsoon session for this single issue.

[Napolean]

Originally Posted by sarv_shaktimaan

Sushma Swaraj 's Lok Sabha speech in reply to allegations over Lalit Modi

what newspaper is carrying this story? You missed providing the link.

[sarv_shaktimaan]

in Punjabi it is said .. bhigo bhigo ke chhittar (joote) maarna.

Here are some of her top quotes in today’s Parliamentary speech:

– I’ve not been blamed once in my 38-year long political career. My public life is spotless. It is the Congressthat is guilty, not me. I repeat, I’ve done nothing wrong.
– You shout ‘we want justice’ but it’s me who needs justice
– My daughter was lawyer no 9, neither she nor my husband took a single rupee from Lalit Modiin this case
– I want to tell Rahul Gandhi you love going on holidays. On your next vacation, when you are alone, read the history of your family. And when you come back, ask your mummy, “how much money did we get in the Quattrochi case?”– Conflict of interest is when P Chidambaram’s wife Nalini accepts a payment of Rs one crore in Saradha scam
– Quid pro quo is what happened during Rajiv Gandhi’s government. Who let Anderson fly out of the country?

---

Last edited by sarv_shaktimaan; August 12th, 2015 at 07:39 AM. Reason: formatting

[sarv_shaktimaan]

Originally Posted by Napolean

what newspaper is carrying this story? You missed providing the link.

Link is being developed to ShaktiTimes.. edited, published and distributed by me. For now operating via Twitter handle @adi7ya.

Every paper and every site had this story for an hour, then they realized and told RaGa to provide a counter, and he did outside the Parliament. So now that is the breaking news on the main pages.

Its amazing Sonia and Rahul Gandhi who hardly spoke to media in 10 years of UPA have given more statements in last one week.

[Mihir15]

SS Pai politics ko bakwaas thread waalo silsilo band kijiye, magaz pak jaata hai, kuch ashdoc babu se shikhiye, interesting material laayiye, otherwise, you are pakavu.

[sarv_shaktimaan]

Originally Posted by Mihir15

SS Pai politics ko bakwaas thread waalo silsilo band kijiye, magaz pak jaata hai, kuch ashdoc babu se shikhiye, interesting material laayiye, otherwise, you are pakavu.

baal pak gaye magaj nahi paka, Mihir the 15th?

[Napolean]

Originally Posted by sarv_shaktimaan

Link is being developed to ShaktiTimes.. edited, published and distributed by me. For now operating via Twitter handle @adi7ya.

Every paper and every site had this story for an hour, then they realized and told RaGa to provide a counter, and he did outside the Parliament. So now that is the breaking news on the main pages.

Its amazing Sonia and Rahul Gandhi who hardly spoke to media in 10 years of UPA have given more statements in last one week.

Then it's ok. I had some doubts about neutrality of the source .

[sarv_shaktimaan]

Originally Posted by Napolean

Then it's ok. I had some doubts about neutrality of the source .

To be neutral and I'm rarely that way, here's what RaGa retorted with, it can't be called a counter.

"I want to ask if Sushmaji carried out the request of Lalit Modi because of his wife's treatment? How much money did Lalit Modi pay Sushma's family to save himself?" he asked.

"The Congress party will not stop speaking. Prime Minister Narendra Modi said he will bring back black money. Where is that black money? Lalit Modi is a symbol of black money in this country," Rahul said. "But the PM's motto is 'Do not see, hear or speak the truth," he continued.

My rebuttal to RaGa would be, why invite more trouble and verbal lashes by inviting PM to speak. If he speaks tomorrow, on the last day of the Monsoon session, you will have a tough time sleeping next to Kharge in Lok Sabha.

[PeaceSeeker]

Just saw on TV Rahul doing an act similar to the one when he tore away the paper and walked away from the media.

This time he was a little more charged, said something like: "as a young parliamentarian, I challenge lalit modi to come back & face the law" and then walked away. A rare instance when he seemed angry & openly confrontational.

[sarv_shaktimaan]

Originally Posted by PeaceSeeker

This time he was a little more charged, said something like: "as a young parliamentarian, I challenge lalit modi to come back & face the law" and then walked away. A rare instance when he seemed angry & openly confrontational.

kitna rehersal kiya hoga usne

btw, he also said today

Sonia: beta Rahool IPL ke chairman hain tumhare Congressi uncle Rajiv Shukla. Kucch soch samajh ke bola karo beta.

[Napolean]

Originally Posted by sarv_shaktimaan

To be neutral and I'm rarely that way, here's what RaGa retorted with, it can't be called a counter.

My point is a newspaper which does not disclose its affiliations with any involved party should not be biased.

A person can be biased and that is allowed.

[sarv_shaktimaan]

Originally Posted by Napolean

My point is a newspaper which does not disclose its affiliations with any involved party should not be biased.

A person can be biased and that is allowed.

I have always maintained that English newspapers are very biased, Hindi papers are still quite neutral and have much more reach and penetration in India.

I noticed recently that having realized the low impact of their biased news coverage, Sardesai and Shekhar Gupta have started writing in Hindi papers.

[Charchila]

So Kaangress with its 44 seats didn't allow the parliament to conduct the entire monsoon session? BJP couldn't do anything with its majority?

Sorry, I don't know enough but I'd have thought BJP can do whatever they want (with some checks/balances, of course) with such an overwhelming majority.

Maybe, in a way, this is the true checks and balances where opposition of any size can prevent a majority from doing their man-maani. Still, I assumed Kaangress was more or less annihilated with its 44 seat count. Anyway, it's a win for democracy, I guess.

[swami]

Being in minority is being powerful atleast in India

The BJP has the majority in Lok Sabha but the bill would not pass in the Rajya Sabha as BJP has no majority over there. So its useless for the BJP to present bills in the parliament so they are allowing congress their dramas

[Charchila]

Originally Posted by swami

Being in minority is being powerful atleast in India

The BJP has the majority in Lok Sabha but the bill would not pass in the Rajya Sabha as BJP has no majority over there. So its useless for the BJP to present bills in the parliament so they are allowing congress their dramas

Ah!

Whatever.

At least it's getting RaGa to talk... best entertainment these days