Aarushi was with Hemraj at the Bed: CBI

[sanjayt]

Originally Posted by Rakhi

Rahul, she was what, 13? Not 30.
Its unlikely that they would be doing ...you know what I mean.

I think she was post-puberty, 14 or so.

At any rate, this is entirely irrelevant because there was no trace of semen on her, and it's sheer speculation.

[sanjayt]

Originally Posted by rahulpsharma

So you are also a traditionalist who tends to think that sex means only penetration....!!

Check with Bill Clinton.

[rahulpsharma]

Originally Posted by sanjayt

Check with Bill Clinton.

Why not Monica? I am sure, she would have felt the prick more...!!

[rahulpsharma]

Originally Posted by sanjayt

I think she was post-puberty, 14 or so.

At any rate, this is entirely irrelevant because there was no trace of semen on her, and it's sheer speculation.

Why do you need semen to be present for any credible evidence of intimacy...??

[sanjayt]

Poor Monica was only a star-struck "kid."

She was only bragging about her "exploits" to a friend who conveniently was wearing an FBI tap (or whatever it's called) to record the conversation.

[sanjayt]

Originally Posted by rahulpsharma

Why do you need semen to be present for any credible evidence of intimacy...??

In court, you would need proof, if you want to say they had had sex. That's why.

[rahulpsharma]

Originally Posted by sanjayt

In court, you would need proof, if you want to say they had had sex. That's why.

In Indian context, an objectionable position could be, kissing also... Where is semen here...!! This issue is getting as vague and evasive as debate on corruption...!!

[sanjayt]

Right ... I was waiting for you to link everything with the nebulous haze that corruption is, at least according to you.

[Rakhi]

Originally Posted by sanjayt

In court, you would need proof, if you want to say they had had sex. That's why.

Originally Posted by rahulpsharma

In Indian context, an objectionable position could be, kissing also... Where is semen here...!! This issue is getting as vague and evasive as debate on corruption...!!

guys guys...we are getting carried away. There was no semen, no kissing...nothing. They had nothing going on. That krishna guy tried to get the girl and Hemraj protested.

[sanjayt]

OK, yeah ... even kissing would be considered an objectionable position.

I guess the blockheads at the CBI are prudes too. Why don't they say what exactly this "objectionable position" is.

Oh, wait. I forgot. They don't have a shred of evidence. Only speculation after speculation.

[rahulpsharma]

Originally Posted by sanjayt

Right ... I was waiting for you to link everything with the nebulous haze that corruption is, at least according to you.

Ok then let's delete the corruption part, which I always want to anyways, and then tell why would one expect semen while kissing, which in an indian context might be deemed a compromising position...!!

[sanjayt]

Originally Posted by Rakhi

guys guys...we are getting carried away. There was no semen, no kissing...nothing. They had nothing going on. That krishna guy tried to get the girl and Hemraj protested.

One more thing. I had seen a layout of the apmt in some magazine.

It had two separate, independent entrances — one for the Talwars, another for Hemraj.

You can't rule out the possibility that Hemraj had given his own key to Krishna or someone else.

[rahulpsharma]

Originally Posted by Rakhi

guys guys...we are getting carried away. There was no semen, no kissing...nothing. They had nothing going on. That krishna guy tried to get the girl and Hemraj protested.

Oh yeah, this makes sense, atleast as an hypothesis... No one knows nothing here...!! But surely that semen thing was pretty much bothering...

[rahulpsharma]

Originally Posted by sanjayt

One more thing. I had seen a layout of the apmt in some magazine.

It had two separate, independent entrances — one for the Talwars, another for Hemraj.

You can't rule out the possibility that Hemraj had given his own key to Krishna or someone else.

But why would Hemraj give his own keys to Krishna to get his own throat slit...??

[sanjayt]

Originally Posted by rahulpsharma

Ok then let's delete the corruption part, which I always want to anyways, and then tell why would one expect semen while kissing, which in an indian context might be deemed a compromising position...!!

I don't have a freakin' clue what the blockheads at the CBI mean by "objectionable position."

If it was missionary, then it means Mr. Talwar hit him real hard on the back of the skull with that golf club? That hard? I don't believe it!

Oh, no evidence either! Because something happened to that golf club?

Numbskulls!