Venky
December 16th, 2005, 10:47 AM
My wedding anniversary is approaching and I am planning to gift a camcorder to my ruly but I am confused as to which compatible format with handycam should I go for , in India.
My budget is 35K rupees at the most , but that does not means that I have to shell out all of it on this handycam .I am willing to shell it out provided I feel convinced that I will be getting my BEST value for money .
What I primarily want from my handycam is - Maximum Optical zoom ie nothing less than 20X ,USB Streaming for editing with a decent viewable picture.By that I mean I am not looking for state of the art video quality .Just want to use it for family vacations and occasions.
Also I am only interested in a Sony Handycam which I ONLY want to use for video and not for steady shots .
So that was what I want and here is what is confusing me -
What are the advantages that a Sony MiniDV format has over the Sony Digital 8 format ?
What are the things that can be done ONLY with a MiniDV that cant be done with a Digital 8 and also viceversa, when both the handycams have a USB streaming .
IS the picture quality of a Digital 8 handycam inferior to that of the MiniDV , provided both the D8 and miniDV have the same lenses and configurations .To me it seems that it's the same as on both these tapes the format for recording is Digital 8 only .
What is the maximum pixel resolution theoritically supported by both D8 and MiniDV ?
If a handycam has Gross 1.7MegaPixels and effective 1MegaPixel , what does that means ? WHat does this means Gross 540 K , Effective 400K.What do the rest do , sit and lay eggs or volunteer turn by turn , so that nobody gets tired or overworked.
Can a handycam really record beyond 350K pixels ? IS pixek count above 350K really usable for video recording , when what our TV supports is only 350K .
How much difference in performance ( video quality ) would be NOTICEABLE between a 12X and a 20 X Optical zoom handycamera.Would it be really significant or just unnis(19) - bees(20) kaa farak hoga ?
All I know is that MiniDV is smaller and compact and hence the size of the handycam is comparitively smaller.A little bit of bulky size is something I can easily do with .
With my limited knowledge , it seems to me that a Sony Digital 8 Camera suits my needs well and also comes for around 19k only . There is another one in D8 which is coming for 28k and the only additional feature it has is - Touch Panel Function w /Active Menu .
What I wanna know is that is a Touch Panel functionaliy really worth going for at the cost of ten thousand rupees , when the rest of the features are the same ?
Another front that confuses me is that these days everybody is going for miniDV , as it's considered to be the latest thing ( if we discard the dvd format) .Now the MIniDV model of the same configuration which is avaliable in my budget is costing around 30K.Now this MiniDv model has the same optical zoom ( 20 X) and the only difference is that it also has a Carl Zeiss Vario Tessar lens ( whatever the fuck that means) and it has slightly more pixel count at 800k/400k.
IS this increased pixel count , (in the miniDV model accompanied with a carl Zeiss Vario Tessar lens ) from 540k/350k to 800k/400k , really capable of giving astonishing results worth ten thousand rupees ?
I can afford this but the question that I am unable to answer is , whether a Carl Zeiss , a MiniDV , unusable pixelcount really worth it at roughly twice the price?I am saying unusable pixel count as I wont be using my handycam, for steadyshots ( have a far superior digital camera for that) and the video which we see on TV is just 350K , anything above that is useless for video shooting .
It surely must have been a pain going through this verbal Dast , but I was confused like hell while searching for the answers to the above queries that at last I had to unwillingly bombard you , once again .
I will be greatly thankful to you all if you can answer my queries and suggest me some sites for additional info or say FAQ's on handycams .
Regards
My budget is 35K rupees at the most , but that does not means that I have to shell out all of it on this handycam .I am willing to shell it out provided I feel convinced that I will be getting my BEST value for money .
What I primarily want from my handycam is - Maximum Optical zoom ie nothing less than 20X ,USB Streaming for editing with a decent viewable picture.By that I mean I am not looking for state of the art video quality .Just want to use it for family vacations and occasions.
Also I am only interested in a Sony Handycam which I ONLY want to use for video and not for steady shots .
So that was what I want and here is what is confusing me -
What are the advantages that a Sony MiniDV format has over the Sony Digital 8 format ?
What are the things that can be done ONLY with a MiniDV that cant be done with a Digital 8 and also viceversa, when both the handycams have a USB streaming .
IS the picture quality of a Digital 8 handycam inferior to that of the MiniDV , provided both the D8 and miniDV have the same lenses and configurations .To me it seems that it's the same as on both these tapes the format for recording is Digital 8 only .
What is the maximum pixel resolution theoritically supported by both D8 and MiniDV ?
If a handycam has Gross 1.7MegaPixels and effective 1MegaPixel , what does that means ? WHat does this means Gross 540 K , Effective 400K.What do the rest do , sit and lay eggs or volunteer turn by turn , so that nobody gets tired or overworked.
Can a handycam really record beyond 350K pixels ? IS pixek count above 350K really usable for video recording , when what our TV supports is only 350K .
How much difference in performance ( video quality ) would be NOTICEABLE between a 12X and a 20 X Optical zoom handycamera.Would it be really significant or just unnis(19) - bees(20) kaa farak hoga ?
All I know is that MiniDV is smaller and compact and hence the size of the handycam is comparitively smaller.A little bit of bulky size is something I can easily do with .
With my limited knowledge , it seems to me that a Sony Digital 8 Camera suits my needs well and also comes for around 19k only . There is another one in D8 which is coming for 28k and the only additional feature it has is - Touch Panel Function w /Active Menu .
What I wanna know is that is a Touch Panel functionaliy really worth going for at the cost of ten thousand rupees , when the rest of the features are the same ?
Another front that confuses me is that these days everybody is going for miniDV , as it's considered to be the latest thing ( if we discard the dvd format) .Now the MIniDV model of the same configuration which is avaliable in my budget is costing around 30K.Now this MiniDv model has the same optical zoom ( 20 X) and the only difference is that it also has a Carl Zeiss Vario Tessar lens ( whatever the fuck that means) and it has slightly more pixel count at 800k/400k.
IS this increased pixel count , (in the miniDV model accompanied with a carl Zeiss Vario Tessar lens ) from 540k/350k to 800k/400k , really capable of giving astonishing results worth ten thousand rupees ?
I can afford this but the question that I am unable to answer is , whether a Carl Zeiss , a MiniDV , unusable pixelcount really worth it at roughly twice the price?I am saying unusable pixel count as I wont be using my handycam, for steadyshots ( have a far superior digital camera for that) and the video which we see on TV is just 350K , anything above that is useless for video shooting .
It surely must have been a pain going through this verbal Dast , but I was confused like hell while searching for the answers to the above queries that at last I had to unwillingly bombard you , once again .
I will be greatly thankful to you all if you can answer my queries and suggest me some sites for additional info or say FAQ's on handycams .
Regards